You are visiting us from Virginia. You are located in HHS Region 3. Your Center is Central East ATTC.

Medication-Assisted Treatment: Promoting Tools for Successful Recovery

February 25, 2019

Pat Stilen, MSW
Co-Director, Mid-America ATTC

Kansas City, home to the Mid-America ATTC at the
University of Missouri Kansas City

A decade ago, few people knew about the array of medications available to support persons in recovery from substance use disorders (SUDs). In the judicial and corrections arenas, if persons coming into jails and prisons were on medication to help mitigate drug cravings, these medications were immediately stopped. Having worked in a field where abstinence was the gold standard for clients, counseling staff from entry-level to supervisors were often suspicious about such medications, and sometimes downright resistant.

...counseling staff from entry level to supervisors were often suspicious about such medications, and sometimes downright resistant. 

Many physicians didn’t get pre-service training in substance use disorders, didn’t see the need to know, and, frankly, didn’t care to work with “those” people. Policymakers were hesitant to add yet another layer of education, treatment and expenses to an already complex and siloed system. In order for the delivery system for SUD medications to be effective, not just the counseling profession, but all four legs of this stool, would need to work together: medical, behavioral health, judicial, and policymakers. There was an urgency to coordinate these groups as the opioid epidemic grew.

Setting the Groundwork for MAT Acceptance 

In 2011, Mid-America ATTC held its first of eight symposia on the use of medications to assist in recovery from substance use disorders. Recognizing the need to move all states in Region 7 along in acceptance of and implementation of medication-assisted treatment (MAT) and to have participants benefit by hearing from other states, Mid-America ATTC held a regional symposium that included Iowa, Kansas, Missouri and Nebraska. In January 2014, a planning committee comprised of representatives from the four state SSA offices and other stakeholders began to plan the two-day regional event.

The planning committee represented a variety of positions: SSA staff, SUD treatment providers, state chief medical directors/physicians, state probation and parole staff persons, drug court staff members, and Veterans Hospital medical staff. Since the state of Missouri was ahead in embracing and implementing MAT, Missouri’s SSA Director, Mark Stringer, provided an opening address. This was followed by a presentation on the science of addiction and how MAT reduces cravings by R. Corey Waller, MD, MS, a national expert in MAT and working with the complex patient. 

Medication-Assisted Treatment: Promoting Tools for Successful Recovery

Through this series of symposia, over 1,700 professionals were made aware of the benefits of using MAT, state policymakers began to change funding strings... and some who were initially resistant became some of the most powerful spokespersons for moving MAT into systems. 

The two-day event, Medication-Assisted Treatment: Promoting Tools for Successful Recovery, was an invitation-only, leadership-focused symposium where participants took part in discussion groups and were challenged to consider MAT as a viable treatment for SUDs. Other state-specific symposia followed using the same model: state leadership opening the event; a national physician expert such as R. Corey Waller, MD, MS, or Edwin Salsitz, MD, FASAM, providing scientific background; a social worker explaining how prescribers can work effectively in partnership with counselors; a panel of persons in recovery using MAT; and other breakout sessions on MAT-relevant topics. According to evaluations, one of the most effective components of this model was the panel of persons in recovery using MAT. 
Between 2011 and 2016, Mid-America ATTC sponsored or co-sponsored eight MAT symposia throughout Region 7. Through this series of symposia, over 1,700 professionals were made aware of the benefits of using MAT, state policymakers began to change funding streams to require MAT as an option for treatment, and some who were initially resistant became some of the most powerful spokespersons for moving MAT into systems. Setting the groundwork for MAT acceptance and implementation in Region 7 took significant time, funding and staff energy. The outcome of Region 7 more willing to embrace this important treatment option was well worth the effort.

Published:
02/22/2019
Tags
Recent posts
Social determinants of health (SDOH) impacting 80% of health outcomes in the U.S. continues to be the norm(1). Healthcare professionals often feel limited when it comes to addressing SDOH, but there is a way to impact change at the system level. Beyond traditional treatment interventions, integrating civic health—active participation in democratic processes and community activities—can […]
ROSC Councils Hosting 2024 National Rally for Recovery in Chicago As a part of creating a recovery-oriented system of care (ROSC) in 2018, the state of Illinois began funding providers to develop ROSC Councils in counties throughout the state. These providers were funded to mobilize key stakeholders in entire counties to work together to promote […]
HealtheKnowledge is a one-stop shop for your online learning needs, with free online learning and low-cost continuing education courses for health and behavioral health professionals. A program of the UMKC School of Nursing and Health Studies’ Collaborative Center to Advance Health Services, HealtheKnowledge offers over 250 public courses. Every course offers a certificate of completion […]
As NIATx moves into its third decade, we continue to explore new terrains in improvement. NIATx has documented success as a framework for change management and for implementing evidence-based practices such as medications for opioid use disorder and behavioral approaches like motivational interviewing. It’s also showing promise as a framework for building culturally responsive care, […]

The opinions expressed herein are the views of the authors and do not reflect the official position of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), SAMHSA, CSAT or the ATTC Network. No official support or endorsement of DHHS, SAMHSA, or CSAT for the opinions of authors presented in this e-publication is intended or should be inferred.

map-markermagnifiercrossmenuchevron-down